- “Ask a Criminologist” Congressional Roundtable: Why Are Homicide Rates Rising?, Washington, DC, July 7, 2016
- Joint Statistical Meetings, Chicago, IL, July 30-August 4, 2016
- American Psychological Association Annual Convention, Denver, CO, August 4-7, 2016
- Rural Sociological Society Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada, August 16-19, 2016
- American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, August 20-23, 2016
- American Political Science Association Annual Meeting & Exhibition, Philadelphia, PA, September 1-4, 2016
- Economic History Association Annual Meeting, Boulder, CO, September 16-18, 2016
A list of COSSA members’ annual meetings and other events can be found on the COSSA website. COSSA members who have an upcoming event they would like to see listed in the Events Calendar and on our website should send an email to email@example.com.
Back to this issue’s table of contents.
On June 9, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Chief Officer for Scientific Workforce Diversity Hannah Valantine updated the NIH Advisory Committee to the Director (ACD) on the findings and recommendations of the ACD’s African American/Black Funding Disparity Working Group. Valantine presented the key findings of the Working Group followed by a discussion of how the Working Group framed its suggestions regarding NIH’s plans to address the issue in the coming months. She reported that the Group’s analysis found that there are funding disparities at every stage of the application process from submissions to funding. In particular, the analysis found that African Americans submit fewer applications, noting that it is a “miniscule applicant pool and even within that small pool there are fewer number of applications per applicant.” Compounding the issue is that there are fewer resubmissions from African Americans. The Working Group found that the initial review score drives resubmission and there is a small component involved as it relates to the research topic. Based on the data and the ongoing analysis, Valantine stressed that the “work needs to continue to be done and NIH needs to continue a vigilant eye on the issue.” (more…)
On June 16, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NAS) hosted a webinar to discuss the findings and limitations of its report, Advancing the Power of Economic Evidence to Inform Investments in Children, Youth, and Families, which was published in May 2016. The report uses cost analysis (CA), which looks at the costs of a program within a specified time period, cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), which determines how much of an outcome is achieved per dollar spent, and benefit-cost analysis (BCA), which determines if the value of the outcome surpass its costs, to evaluate which of the government’s many intervention programs work well as currently designed, which need tweaking or improvement, and which should be cut altogether. (more…)