|

According
to Science, advisory committees are “the primary
mechanism for government agencies to harness the wisdom and
expertise of the scientific community in shaping the national
agenda for both research and regulation.” The Federal
Advisory Committee Act (FACA) requires that federal committees
be “fairly balanced in terms of the points of view
represented” and provide advice that “will not
be inappropriately influenced by the appointing authority
or by any special interest.” Yet instead of seeking
quality advice from expert appointments, the Bush Administration
has:
- appointed
people with scant scientific credentials but strong industry
ties;
- appointed
nonexperts with right-wing ideological agendas;
- stacked
advisory committees with numerous pro-industry or ideological
appointees;
- opposed
the appointment or reappointment of qualified experts,
including some of the most respected scientists in their
fields, on the basis of political litmus tests.
|
|
|
|
 |

The minority
staff of the House Government Reform Committee is continuing to
investigate the state of scientific integrity in the Bush Administration.
All submissions will be kept
strictly confidential. |
|
 |
|
|
|