Presented by Rep. Henry A. Waxman, Ranking Member, Committee on Government Reform

Politics and Science


Manipulation of Scientific Committees
Distortion of Scientific Information
Interference with Scientific Research
Search
E-Mail This Page
Print This Page
 

Manipulation of Scientific Committees

Examples
Abstinence-Only Education
Environmental Health
Food Safety
Global Warming
HIV/AIDS
Lead Poisoning
Reproductive Health
Substance Abuse
Workplace Safety

According to Science, advisory committees are “the primary mechanism for government agencies to harness the wisdom and expertise of the scientific community in shaping the national agenda for both research and regulation.” The Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) requires that federal committees be “fairly balanced in terms of the points of view represented” and provide advice that “will not be inappropriately influenced by the appointing authority or by any special interest.” Yet instead of seeking quality advice from expert appointments, the Bush Administration has:

  • appointed people with scant scientific credentials but strong industry ties;
  • appointed nonexperts with right-wing ideological agendas;
  • stacked advisory committees with numerous pro-industry or ideological appointees;
  • opposed the appointment or reappointment of qualified experts, including some of the most respected scientists in their fields, on the basis of political litmus tests.





 
The Repot
Submit Information
The minority staff of the House Government Reform Committee is continuing to investigate the state of scientific integrity in the Bush Administration. All submissions will be kept strictly confidential.
Updates - E-mail Mailing List
Politics and Science | Presented by Rep. Henry A. Waxman, Ranking Member, Committee on Government Reform